gravityboy ([info]gravityboy) wrote,
@ 2005-07-11 22:03:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
X.Org Has Been Uploaded
I wish I could say that the subject says it all, but that's not quite true.

First off: it's true that X.Org has been uploaded to unstable. Steve Langasek talked with the gcc maintainers and they decided that X.Org wouldn't block gcc4, so I got the approval to upload. Steve, as ever, is awesome.

Then Daniel Stone noticed that the packages are missing updated MANIFEST files for many of the ports. These files were put in place in the X build system long ago so as to manage to complexity of new upstream revisions. Because there's just so much stuff in the X source tree, there had to be an automated way to deal with making sure everything was present and accounted for. The end result of this is that if a MANIFEST that we have doesn't match up with the one generated while building the package, the build will fail. So what's going to happen is that with this upload, some architectures will get the X.Org packages, and others will not due to build failures. I uploaded i386 packages, so that will definitely go through right away, and ppc, sparc, amd64, and I believe mips should all go through as well.

The reason we went with this plan is that when the builds fail, the build logs will give us a diff for the MANIFEST for each arch. So what I can do is use those to fix the MANIFEST files tomorrow, rebuild as fast as my laptop can manage, and upload the -2 revision which has correct MANIFEST files. Steve, Daniel, and Ryan Murray all directed me in deciding on this plan, and I owe them a ton for all their help.

Already we've hit a build error in s390 that we're working through, but hopefully we can get all the ports in line ASAP so that this can transition to etch. But here it is. After a long wait and lots of work by lots of people, X.Org is finally entering Debian.

I think I need a glass of scotch.



(Post a new comment)


[info]lukey_boy
2005-07-12 03:03 am UTC (link)
Congratulations, can't wait to use it! You deserve the scotch :-)

(Reply to this)

Congrats!
[info]zoep
2005-07-12 11:26 am UTC (link)
So after tonight I get to remove another extraneous line from my sources.list! Huzzah! ;-)

(Reply to this)


[info]annie_linux
2005-07-12 01:35 pm UTC (link)
Congrats and thanks again. :-)

(Reply to this)

Yay!
(Anonymous)
2005-07-12 01:36 pm UTC (link)
Yay!!

// Ulf Härnhammar

(Reply to this)


[info]plasticmongoose
2005-07-12 03:43 pm UTC (link)
Ill buy you a scotch, you rock :D

(Reply to this)

nvidia-glx
(Anonymous)
2005-07-13 01:30 am UTC (link)
I upgraded and everything went fine except I had to deinstall nvidia-glx during the process . Is there a way to reinstall it ?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: nvidia-glx
(Anonymous)
2005-07-13 07:35 am UTC (link)
I had to reinstall the nvidia drivers upon upgrading. Just download them from www.nvidia.com

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Xorg
(Anonymous)
2005-07-13 06:50 am UTC (link)
It took lot of time but finally is here. Changes in debian are sloooow but I hope so to be real stable and working. XFree sucks in stable releases, lots of problems.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Xorg
(Anonymous)
2005-07-13 09:06 am UTC (link)
I tried to install it, but I have issues: libglu1-xorg conflicts with xlibmesa-glu and if I force the install of the xorg package (and remove the X one), it breaks 7 packages: libgle3, libwxgtk2.4, libxine1, libsdl-perl, libwxgtk2.4-python, nvidia-glx, xscreensaver-gl.

Should I file a bug in each of these packages?

jerome (@coffeebreaks.org)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Xorg
(Anonymous)
2005-07-13 03:23 pm UTC (link)
Nah, it was the gaim upgrade caught in the middle of the gcc transition that caused those issues.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

xcompmgr
(Anonymous)
2005-07-13 01:43 pm UTC (link)
Any news on when XCompMgr or KompMgr is going to be uploaded?

-- strider

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: xcompmgr
[info]gravityboy
2005-07-13 03:52 pm UTC (link)
Meh... I'm not particularly motivated to package xcompmgr, although I'll probably get around to it at some point. Composite is basically unuseable at present because of architectural issues (which will start to get sorted out in the next release from X.Org) so there's not really any impetus to ship xcompmgr except to stop having to answer this question.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: xcompmgr
[info]gravityboy
2005-07-13 03:53 pm UTC (link)
Oh, and I forgot to mention. If you want to maintain the app yourself, please do! If you need a sponsor for it, I can do so.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: xcompmgr
(Anonymous)
2005-07-14 04:24 am UTC (link)
sorry mate I can't, not enough time at the moment.
I was just saying cause I had an ubuntu installation a little while back (couldn't stand waiting 6 months for new updated packages though), and the xcompmgr was pretty fun. But yeah it has a couple of obvious memory leaks though and had to be restarted after a few hours. Also on the off chance I wanted to play a fullscreen game it didn't like that. So I guess it's not really in the debian style and won't be for perhaps another month and a half!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Yes, my nvidia-glx flied away too
(Anonymous)
2005-07-13 03:55 pm UTC (link)
Congratulations anf thank you for including Xorg.
I hope the transition were fast to recover mi 3d aceleration! :-) (I prefer to install nvidia driver from debian packages rather than from nvidia installer to keep then up-to-date and coherent with the whole system)

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…